Re: Moratorium on Hari Discussion
Mike,
I have to agree with you. While there may
have been some statements made which go beyond
the scope of a purely technical discussion,
most of us are smart enough to discount those
emotional issues and focus on the technical and
logical merits of the discussion. I see no reason
to halt the progress of this debate.
Pat Gilliland
--------------------------------------------------
At 07:46 AM 11/30/99 -0700, you wrote:
>
>why? while i haven't followed every last word, and while there may be
some unusual
>behind-the-scenes discussion, i (for one) haven't seen a serious problem.
>--
>jmw
>
>Jonathan Thatcher wrote:
>
>> At the mutual request of Geoff Thompson and myself, we would like to ask
all
>> parties to abide a temporary moratorium on all reflector discussion
>> regarding Hari. I have requested that Geoff intervene and mediate this
>> discussion.
>>
>> We understand that this is highly irregular (and in at least my experience,
>> unprecedented).
>> Unfortunately, Geoff is temporarily (hardware issues) unable to access the
>> reflector messages, and unable to bring himself up to speed. The moratorium
>> is therefore requested until such time as Geoff can capture the gist of the
>> "discussion," contact the various participants, and attempt to resolve the
>> non-technical issues blocking our path to progress.
>>
>> Respectfully,
>>
>> Jonathan Thatcher
>