RE: PAM-5, what are your BERs ?
JR:
thanks for better clarity, and i agree completely. i see little reason to compel
anyone to choose one technology over another. standards bodies are more
concerned with answering the question 'can it be done?'.
--
J M Wincn, Staff Engineer
Cielo Communications, Inc.
325 Interlocken Pkwy, Bldg A
Broomfield, CO 80021-3497
Voice: 303-464-2264
Cell: 408-394-5283
Fax: 303-460-6348
At 08:34 AM 01-03-2000 -0800, JR Rivers wrote:
>During the course of these discussions, I've seen people use "hard to do in
>CMOS" as a reason to reject a proposal.
>
>I'm not trying to say that someone couldn't/shouldn't build a 10GbE
>transceiver in CMOS; however, I am questioning the REQUIREMENT that it be
>built in CMOS at standardization. I've been working on Ethernet products
>for quite a long time, and every signalling technology has started off with
>some non-CMOS implementation and eventually been reduced to CMOS.
>
>JR