Re:

["Seto, Koichiro" <seto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

[Date: 03/24/2000  From Seto]

Ben,

Just FYI, 
Many (all?) 1000BASE-T PHYs support GMII.  
Also many (all?) also support 10b mode just in case the mating MAC does not 
support GMII.
It seems PHY vendors did not worry about puttint 'extra' 10B8B coder inside 
their 1000BASE-T PHY.

Seto

> 
> 
> Tripathi,
> 
> The MII is an example of an exposed interface because it has a
> connector specified and the UNH IOL can test to it.
> 
> The GMII is not an exposed interface since it is impossible
> for UNH IOL to test to it. It is a convenience for the purpose
> of writing the standard and (perhaps) for vendors to design
> parts to the interface (though I don't know of any PHYs which
> support this).
> 
> The XGMII will be similar to GMII, not MII. It won't be an
> exposed interface and I doubt a connector will be specified
> for it (since we're argueing about how few inches it can
> travel).
> 
> Ben
> 
> Devendra Tripathi wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Even though I find some comments from Roy a little pessimistic, I too 
get
> > confused sometimes
> > by different comments from different people. Could we state clearly 
that
> > XGMII is a possible
> > "exposed" interface, on the lines of MII/GMII and also that UniPHY
> > architecture is consistent
> > with it (I think Howard already said this earlier).
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Tripathi.
> 
> 
> -- 
> -----------------------------------------
> Benjamin Brown
> Router Products Division
> Nortel Networks
> 1 Bedford Farms,
> Kilton Road
> Bedford, NH 03110
> 603-629-3027 - Work
> 603-624-4382 - Fax
> 603-798-4115 - Home
> bebrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> -----------------------------------------
>