Re: Nomenclature poll...
Brad,
I prefer option 2.
Just I do not want to see mis-interpretation from 10GBASE-LX4 into
10GBASE-LX when I order my equipment; dropping/forgetting the last
character could be happen in somewhere ......
Regards,
Osamu
At 1:47 PM -0700 00.5.31, Booth, Bradley wrote:
> Assuming that we go with 10GBASE- instead of 10kBASE-, which suffix
> structure does everyone prefer:
> 1) <wavelength> <coding scheme> <# of wavelengths>, or
> 2) <wavelength> <# of wavelengths> <coding scheme>
>
> An example of #1 would be: 10GBASE-SX for 850nm 64b/66b Serial, and
> 10GBASE-LW4 for 1310nm SONET compatible WDM.
>
> An example of #2 would be: 10GBASE-SX for 850nm 64b/66b Serial, and
> 10GBASE-L4W for 1310nm SONET compatible WDM.
>
>
> As a note, no matter which one we choose, we are still dealing with a large
> list of port types.
>
> Thanks,
> Brad
-----------------------------------------
Osamu ISHIDA
NTT Network Innovation Laboratories
TEL +81-468-59-3263 FAX +81-468-55-1282