RE: PMD discussion
Ed,
To add to your point....If time-to-market is important, then serial
solutions should be considered as they are the furthest along, product-wise.
Not to mention the simplicity and low cost benefits.
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: Cornejo, Edward (Edward) [mailto:ecornejo@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 1:56 PM
To: 'jay.hoge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Cc: '802.3ae'; 'Jack Jewell'
Subject: RE: PMD discussion
Good point Jay. I am not in favor of splitting up the pie anymore than we
have to. And speaking from a PMD supplier perspective, the fewer projects we
need to fund and resource the better for time to market and time to cost.
Cheers,
Ed
> ----------
> From: jay.hoge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx[SMTP:jay.hoge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 10:58 AM
> To: Cornejo, Edward (Edward)
> Cc: '802.3ae'; 'Jack Jewell'
> Subject: RE: PMD discussion
>
>
>
>
> Ed,
>
> I agree with you for the most part. It's important to remember, however,
> that each time we split the pie by adding another PMD, the volume of each
> goes down and the price of each goes up. Price deltas are a slippery
> slope.
>
> Jay
>
>