Re: D2.0 ASCII ballot and comment form
Pat,
Looking at some old GE comments, the subclause included the clause
number in most cases.
Best Regards,
Rich
--
pat_thaler@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Brad,
>
> There is something not obvious to me. Is the subclause field suppose to
> include the clause number or not? For example, is a comment on 4.2.8:
>
> Clause: 4
> Subclause: 2.8
>
> or
>
> Clause: 4
> Subclause: 4.2.8
>
> Pat
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Booth, Bradley [mailto:bradley.booth@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 3:09 PM
> To: HSSG (E-mail)
> Subject: D2.0 ASCII ballot and comment form
>
> All,
>
> Shimon Muller found an omission (page and line numbers) in the ASCII version
> of the ballot/comment form for D2.0. I've enclosed an updated version. For
> those that have submitted ASCII comments to-date, you do not need to
> re-submit the comments.
>
> Thank you,
> Brad
>
> <<10GigBallot.txt>>
-------------------------------------------------------
Richard Taborek Sr. Phone: 408-845-6102
Chief Technology Officer Cell: 408-832-3957
nSerial Corporation Fax: 408-845-6114
2500-5 Augustine Dr. mailto:rtaborek@xxxxxxxxxxx
Santa Clara, CA 95054 http://www.nSerial.com