RE: Local Fault/Remote Fault
Happy New Year to all! Now back to work, only 2 days left...
Boaz,
I believe there is no path between the transmit path and the receive
path.
If a device detects a fault condition in the transmit path, it should
attempt to send
Local Fault on its transmit output bus, i.e., in the direction toward
the media.
If a device detects a fault condition in the receive path, it should
attempt to send
Local Fault on its receive output bus, i.e., in the direction toward the
RS.
Steve Finch
Boaz Shahar <boazs@xxxxxxxxxxxx> on 12/31/2000 01:43:00 AM
To: "'Stephen.Finch@xxxxxx'" <Stephen.Finch@xxxxxx>,
stds-802-3-hssg@xxxxxxxx
cc:
Subject: RE: Local Fault/Remote Fault
Some comments/questions:
>
> 1. Any device, in either its transmit or receive paths, could
> detect a fault condition. The fault may be that the data
> being received is invalid or that some internal problem
> is causing the problem. Some/many faults may go
> undetected. If a device detects a fault condition (i.e.,
> a locally detected fault) it should set its link status
> to zero and not forward what is received, but should,
> at its output, either:
>
> a. generate a local fault pulse ordered set if it is
> capable of doing so,
If, for instance, in the system: RS - DTE XGXS - (XAUI) - PHY XGXS -
PCS -
PMA - PMD a local fault is detected by the local PCS by recognizing
that
the XAUI lanes (In the Transmit path) are not de skewed. Then the
intention
is that a LF indication will be signaled to the local RS via the RX
path?
(That is, the PCS will have a connection from the Transmit path to the
receive path?)
>