RE: Management PMA/PMD registers for XAUI
Pat,
The XGXS layer implements all the functions that are associated with both
the 10GBASE-X PCS and 10GBASE-X PMA defined in clause 48. If in the XGXS
case there is no need for the implementation of the PMA registers (And I
think that there is NO need for that), why it is needed in the case of
10GBASE-X PMA?
Boaz
> -----Original Message-----
> From: THALER,PAT (A-Roseville,ex1) [mailto:pat_thaler@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 7:58 PM
> To: Justin Gaither; 802.3ae
> Subject: RE: Management PMA/PMD registers for XAUI
>
>
>
> Justin,
>
> As currently defined, there is only a single PMA in the stack which is
> attached to the PMD. An XGXS doesn't have a separate PMA
> sublayer. I think
> we should leave it that way. We already fragment the physical
> layer into a
> lot of sublayers.
>
> Regards,
> Pat
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Gaither [mailto:jgaither@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 7:19 AM
> To: 802.3ae
> Subject: Management PMA/PMD registers for XAUI
>
>
>
> When a 10GBase-X PCS is being used as a PHY XGXS, it has a XAUI PMA.
> Should this PMA have all of the Management registers
> specified (ie. 1.0,
> 1.1, 1.2&1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.8, 1.9)? Or are these registers for the
> PMA/PMD that actually tied to the fiber PMD?
>
> Regards,
>
> justin
>
> --
> Justin Gaither Phone: 512-306-7292 x529
> RocketChips a Division of Xilinx Fax: 512-306-7293
> 500 N. Capital of TX Hwy.
> Bldg 3 email: jgaither@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Austin, TX 78746 WWW: www.rocketchips.com
>