Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: [802.3ae] PICS proforma table of clause 50 of D3.4



Title:
Manish,
 
Thanks for your e-mail, and for reviewing the draft and noting the discrepancies.
 
The issue with the K1/K2 byte values in the Value/Comment portions of the PICS tables was first pointed out by Mike Heard in November. I have already submitted a comment against D3.4 to fix this problem.
 
The issue with the Value/Comment field of TP11 in the PICS is new, and is most definitely a typo. I'll raise an editorial comment in the interim next week. It should be fixed in the next draft.
 
Once again, thanks for your diligence.
 
Best regards,
 
- Tom Alexander
WIS Scribe
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Manish Agrawal [mailto:agrawal.manish@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 1:56 AM
To: HSSG Reflector (E-mail)
Subject: [802.3ae] PICS proforma table of clause 50 of D3.4

Hello,

Some discrepancies in the actual description and the PICS proforma tables are :


1.  In clause 50.6..2 (WIS transmit functions) table

      a.  Item "WT10 K1 octet in Line Overhead 50.3.2.2 Set to 00000001 binary M Yes []"  

               should be replaced by

          "WT10 K1 octet in Line Overhead 50.3.2.2 Set to 00000000 binary M Yes []"

      b.   Item "WT11 Bits 1 to 5 of K2 octet in Line 50.3.2.2 Set to 00010 binary M Yes []"

             should be replaced by

          "WT11 Bits 1 to 5 of K2 octet in Line 50.3.2.2 Set to 00000 binary M Yes []


2. In clause 50.6..7 (WIS test pattern generator and checker)

      a.   Item " TP11 Alternating value for CID pattern 50.3.8.2.2 72 bits of zeros in first frame and 72 bits of zeros in second M Yes []"

                           Should be replaced by

                    " TP11 Alternating value for CID pattern 50.3.8.2.2 72 bits of zeros in first frame and 72 bits of ones in second M Yes []"



Best Regards,
Manish