Re: Issues concerning 10GbE speed standards
- To: nuss@lucent.com
- Subject: Re: Issues concerning 10GbE speed standards
- From: Dae Young KIM <dykim@ccl.chungnam.ac.kr>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 09:34:56 +0900
- CC: Drew Perkins <drew.perkins@lightera.com>, "'Paul Bottorff'" <pbottorf@nortelnetworks.com>, "'Peter_Wang@3com.com'" <Peter_Wang@3com.com>, "'rabynum@airmail.net'" <rabynum@airmail.net>, "'stds-802-3-hssg@ieee.org'" <stds-802-3-hssg@ieee.org>
- Organization: Chungnam Nat'l Univ., InfoCom Eng. Dept.
- References: <2072E1221F1DD211848C00104B938E7B733561@lightera.com> <377792B7.E990FC1@tesla.ho.lucent.com>
- Sender: owner-stds-802-3-hssg@majordomo.ieee.org
Martin Nuss wrote:
> 4) the lower line rate (10.00 vs. 12.5 Gb/s) directly translates into
> longer distances supported, more power budget, and less penalties (such
> as DMD).
To be exact, the lower Line Bandwidth should translate into longer distances, etc.
If any binary code should consume lower bandwidth than the scrambled NRZ, would
you care for it?
--
Dae Young
http://ccl.chungnam.ac.kr/~dykim/