Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
The main output from this meeting was Stretch's updated email http://www.ieee802.org/3/10G_study/public/serial_adhoc/email/msg00592.html . Stretch pointed out that attempting to do the same thing in different laboratories (as opposed to a round-robin approach with common parts) has merit because we learn something about consistency. Discussion of filter bandwidth for stressed eye generator. Assume filter bandwidth is an electrical bandwidth and so is the 7.5 GHz standard filter. Can anyone confirm? Petar's experience with different physical filters is that 5 GHz electrical is too much (too much ISI?) so how come Tom had 4 GHz? We could use a common physical filter as input to both scope and error detector - would have worse tolerance than the filter built into the scope, not sure about consistency. Discussion of how to know if 1% of histogram is the right metric: sample histograms would be interesting. Concern about fat tailed distributions - let's see. It is hoped that each company will be able to measure at least a couple of DUTs, e.g. from two different batches. Draft 4.2 expected soon. Present ------- Piers Dawe Agilent SPG Peter Ohlen Optillion Petar Pepeljugoski IBM Stretch Camnitz Agilent T&M David Kabal Picolight Next phone meeting ------------------ Tuesday 26 March, at the usual time and coordinates: 4:15 pm GMT = 17:15 CET = 11:15 am EST = 8:15 am PST +1(816)650-0631 Access code 39209 Piers