George,
Please reserve a time slot for a presentation on the topic:
“Requirements on Link Quality Diagnostics” as a result of our conversation during my last presentation in the adhoc.
|
Title |
Presenter(s) |
Affiliation |
Time (mins) |
Start |
End |
s.above Ludwig Winkel Siemens AG 25
With best regards,
Ludwig Winkel
Siemens AG
Digital Factory Division
Technology and Innovations
DF TI SR
Oestliche Rheinbrueckenstr. 50
76187 Karlsruhe, Germany
Tel.: +49 721 595-6098
Mobile: +49 172 6132658
mailto:ludwig.winkel@xxxxxxxxxxx
www.twitter.com/siemens
www.siemens.com/ingenuityforlife
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Gerhard Cromme; Managing Board: Joe Kaeser, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; Roland
Busch, Lisa Davis, Klaus Helmrich, Janina Kugel, Siegfried Russwurm, Ralf P. Thomas; Registered offices: Berlin and Munich, Germany; Commercial registries: Berlin Charlottenburg, HRB 12300, Munich, HRB 6684; WEEE-Reg.-No. DE 23691322
From: George Zimmerman [mailto:george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2016 17:47
To: STDS-802-3-10SPE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_10SPE] Reminder - presentation requests due tomorrow, Wednesday 10/26
The deadline for requests for presentations for the November plenary is tomorrow, Wednesday, October 26, 2016, AOE. Please email your request to myself, and to Jon Lewis. If you wish to send your request to the reflector,
that would be better, as other people will then know what to expect to discuss. This helps build consensus.
Please include:
-
Presenter’s name & affiliation
-
Title of the presentation
-
A brief summary of what you expect to present and what it is aimed at (support for an objective, support for a particular CSD, PAR modification, etc.). 2 to 3 sentences would be nice. Repeating the title is often not useful.
-
Approximate time required for presentation and expected questions.
I would like to encourage presentations focused on filling out our objectives and supporting our CSDs and PAR proposal. We have had very useful ad hoc discussion, but in the end, ad hoc discussion is about building consensus.
We must now bring that consensus into the study group meeting. What I would like to see would be summary presentations with pointers to the relevant ad hoc material (no need to repeat the full detail), and what the objective supported is.
Additionally, (while I’m not usually big on “supporters” lists) on proposals for objectives or CSDs it is useful to solicit supporters, so that the group can see what has broad support. The process of circulating the
presentation often helps build consensus (and yes, changes are made), and brings out any areas that would require discussion on the floor.
George Zimmerman, Ph.D.
10 Mb/s Single Twisted Pair Ethernet Study Group
President & Principal
CME Consulting, Inc.
Experts in Advanced PHYsical Communications
310-920-3860