Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
George-I don't know. I see two interpretations.#1Maintain a bit error ratio (BER) at the MAC/PLS service interface of less than or equal to 10^-10 on link segments up to at least 15m.
Maintain a bit error ratio (BER) at the MAC/PLS service interface of less than or equal to 10^-9 on all link segments up to at least 1km.(which to my eyes would imply but not require two PHYs)#2Maintain a bit error ratio (BER) at the MAC/PLS service interface of less than or equal to:
10^-10 on link segments up to at least 15m, and
10^-9 on all link segments greater than 15m up to at least 1km(which to my eyes would imply a single PHY)...but would be clearer wording.Which is it?GeoffOn Oct 28, 2016, at 11:46 AMPDT, George Zimmerman <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:We have had some round-abouts on how to write the BER objective. Ludwig had proposed a nice split, where the short-reach/automotive PHYs had a 10^-10 BER objective and the longer reach ones had a 10^-9 BER objective. With that in mind, I propose the following objective for discussion:Maintain a bit error ratio (BER) at the MAC/PLS service interface of less than or equal to:10^-10 on link segments up to at least 15m, and10^-9 on all link segments up to at least 1kmDo we have consensus?George Zimmerman, Ph.D.President & PrincipalCME Consulting, Inc.Experts in Advanced PHYsical Communications