| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
| Thomas- I feel this is not quite adequate. While the file is retrievable from the URL that you provided, there is no appearance of the file that is visible to anyone who does not have your e-mail in hand. That is, the file does not appear on the directory page of the public directory in which it was stored. Nor does it appear under any obvious link on the Study Group page I see no good reason why the participants should have to wait until a meeting presentation before we are provided with a DIFF document. We need this information now so that the participants can each make an informed decision as to whether it is appropriate to embrace V3.2 at this meeting The entry in the "Revisions History" (page ix) of version 3.2 is inadequate for that purpose and there seems to be nothing else provided at this time. We need a DIFF document of the same manner that is provided between draft versions in 802.3 balloting. It is a well established custom in 802.3 that a DIFF version of each draft is supplied whenever a new draft is distributed to a Task force. Moreover, the submitters continue to thwart our participants ability to generate a DIFF document on their own. The most recent document provided is locked (as are the 2 earlier versions) with respect to any of the following actions: Page extraction Commenting Content copying (as in generating a drop-out text file to use for comparison) Also, it would be helpful for the group's reference purposes if the provided drafts had line numbers. Based on these problems, I am reluctant to consider this an appropriate document for the July meeting. Best regards, Geoff Thompson On Jul 2, 2014, at 10:28 PMPDT, Hogenmueller Thomas (AE-BE/EKE) <Thomas.Hogenmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|