| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Chris – Clause 92 has a lot of non-channel stuff in it, and the parenthetical insert, while clarifying to those who know clause
92 intimately, isn’t perhaps as clear as you could be.
Pointing to the correct subclause, a figure or a table would be a lot better. The wording itself leads to confusion because it says “over copper
twinaxial cables consistent with”, but TP0 to TP5 includes more than the twinax cables, as you know.
We end up with a couple of choices: 1)
Just identify the cables in clause 92, or 2)
Say operate over the whole TP0 to TP5 channel in clause 92 (I apologize because I have another call which conflicted with yesterday’s meeting – I don’t have an opinion on whether
using the whole channel from TP0 to TP5 is in fact the correct objective, or whether you want to do just the cables) If you just want to do (1) just the cables, the cable assembly is specified in 92.10 (and references elsewhere), I would
suggest stating •Define a single-lane 25Gb/s PHY for
operation over copper
twin-axial cables consistent
with cable assemblies
specified in IEEEStd802.3bj-2014 Clause92.10 And, if you want to do the whole channel, including the PCB, as you stated, from TP0 to TP5, Clause 92.9 clearly specifies
this (by referencing other subclauses) •Define a single-lane 25Gb/s PHY for
operation over copper
twin-axial cables consistent
with cable assemblies
specified in IEEEStd802.3bj-2014 Clause92.9 Note I’m looking at draft 3.2 of the 802.3bj, and don’t have the final published version. George Zimmerman Principal, CME Consulting Experts in Advanced
PHYsical Communications Technology george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 310-920-3860 (PLEASE NOTE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS.
THE OTHER WILL STILL WORK, BUT PLEASE USE THIS FOR CME BUSINESS) From: Christopher
T. Diminico [mailto:00000025925d7602-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxx] Colleagues,
Based on the discussions of the objective given on slide 9 second bullet in
http://www.ieee802.org/3/25GSG/public/adhoc/architecture/nowell_081214_25GE_adhoc.pdf
during the ad-hoc yesterday, I suggest we explicitly identify 802.3bj channel by adding (TP0-TP5).
Change from •Define a single-lane 25Gb/s PHY for operation over copper twin-axial cables consistent with channels specified in IEEEStd802.3bj-2014
Clause92 To •Define a single-lane 25Gb/s PHY for operation over copper twin-axial cables consistent with channels (TP0-TP5) specified in IEEEStd802.3bj-2014
Clause92 Regards,
Chris DiMinico -----Original Message----- Sorry everyone – calendar screw up on my side around the re-arranged architecture ad-hoc meeting. Will update soon with improved logistics. Mark On 8/19/14, 5:42 PM, "Mark Nowell (mnowell)" <mnowell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Dear 25Gb/s Ethernet Study Group Members, A few reminders and updates: 1)
Optical Ad-hoc is tomorrow Wed 8/20 @ 9am PST. Dial in details are here: http://www.ieee802.org/3/25GSG/public/adhoc/index.html 2)
Architecture ad-hoc meeting next week has moved to Wed 8/27 @ (am PST (shifted from Tues). Dial in details are here: http://www.ieee802.org/3/25GSG/public/adhoc/index.html 3)
Reminders on Call for presentations and September Meeting planning. Presentation request deadline is Friday Aug 29th. Please see my original email for details on meeting logistics and travel planning (We meet all-day Thurs and Friday). http://www.ieee802.org/3/25GSG/email/msg00004.html As a reminder, the September Study Group meeting has limited meeting time and the presentations will be focused on the Study Group
work of building objectives, developing responses to the CSD (5 Criteria) and PAR. Presentations outside of the scope of those priorities will be given time on agenda as possible. Regards…Mark |