Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi, everyone: 1, in table 105-2, the clause 74 are mark “M” BASE-R FEC for the 5 PMDs, and Clause 108(~Clause91) are Mark “M” for CR, KR, SR, My question is: are those 2 FEC options need to be select one for use? Or …??? 2, the current 25GMII and PCS are scale up from 10GE, while using RS-FEC, AMs need to be inserted. The rooms for AMs are ready in 100GE for 802.3bj
clause 91 FEC(remap), but not ready for 25GE that scale up from 10GE PCS. So the Figure 108-2 shows a rate compensation for making rooms for codeword markers. This implying Idle insert and delete
operations. And thus imply descrambling, (decode), Idle insert/delete, (encode) descrambling. My understanding is, this functionality of making rooms for AMs were done in PCS over CGMII/XLGMII, we should move this
functionality to the Clause 107, as one of the optional enhancements to clause 49 PCS(simple text described 107.1.2 consist with 802.3ba, rather than to show it in figure 108-2, we can refer to Figure 82-2) while using RS-FEC. Is my understanding right ? or there are other considerations?
Best regards Qiwen
|