Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Colleagues, There has been some discussion via email about the pros and cons of stating our objectives as either: Provide
PMD specification which support 25 Gb/s operation over at least 10 km on SMF. Provide
PMD specification which support 25 Gb/s operation over at least 40 km on SMF. Or alternatively: Provide
Physical Layer specifications
which support 25 Gb/s operation over at least 10 km of SMF. Provide
Physical Layer specifications
which support 25 Gb/s operation over at least 40 km of SMF. In order to ensure we have consensus before submitting the PAR, I would like to request a presentation or presentations arguing the case for one versus the other.
I have received a statement from Kohichi Tamura that for 40 km he does not see a need for a different FEC than the one already included in 802.3by.
Therefore the argument in favor of saying “Physical Layer” is that we will need to include changes to non-PMD clauses in order to implement any new PMDs. Please let me know ASAP if someone is willing to make a presentation on this subject and I will add it to the agenda for Monday. Regards, David Lewis Acting SG Chair |