Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
I did not agree of disagree with any speed, I just tried to make clear what was exactly proposed.
From: <Dedic>, Ian <Ian.Dedic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "Dedic, Ian" <Ian.Dedic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thursday 17 July 2014 15:10 To: "STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [STDS-802-3-400G] [802.3_400G] Presentation for next week
Is there really much point spending all the time and effort needed to define a new 800G standard which is only a 2x speed increment? Why not just use 2 400G interfaces?
Just because we *can* define another standard doesn't mean we *should*... Ian ---------------------- Ian Dedic Chief Engineer Fujitsu Semiconductor Europe 3 Concorde Park, Concorde Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 4FJ, UK Email : Ian.Dedic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tel : +44(1628)50-4711 www : http://emea.fujitsu.com/semiconductor
From: Fred Rabouw (frabouw) [mailto:frabouw@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 04:30 AM To: STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [STDS-802-3-400G] [802.3_400G] Presentation for next week I presume 1.6T and 800G for switches and 800G for servers, for 800G on servers and no 800G on switches would be challenging to connect….
Regards
Fred
From: Chris Cole <chris.cole@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Chris Cole <chris.cole@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Monday 14 July 2014 23:24 To: "STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <STDS-802-3-400G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [STDS-802-3-400G] [802.3_400G] Presentation for next week ________________________________________ |