| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Yair Find the text below for your slide 6 Terms Used in this Presentation
Thanks Kousi From: "Darshan, Yair" <YDarshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: "Darshan, Yair" <YDarshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:04:35 +0300 To: <STDS-802-3-4PPOE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [802.3_4PPOE] Website Updated, Action Items Hi David, I have reviewed your presentation and I believe it is very good and I use some of the PSE Type titles that you have used + some of your notes that allow to simplify the presentation, the matrix table and also I believe address Jeff comments. I have send updated presentation few minutes ago. Please note that I still have a bit more items in the table compared to yours mainly because that I believe that our starting point for discussion regarding 4P system, need to contain at least two 4P system with different maximum power level. Please see the rational of it in note 4 for the matrix table. Most of it similar to your table. In addition I have narrowed the possible PSEs that may allowed by the standard to those who relevant to the objectives of our ad-hoc so we save a slide or two as well. We will discuss it during the meeting. Many thanks. Yair From: Abramson, David [mailto:david.abramson@xxxxxx] Hi Yair, I have attached a presentation to this email with some thoughts on the compatibility matrix. I think we need to keep it as simple as possible, while still conveying the information needed. I wanted to get this suggestion in front of everyone before the conference call. Regards, David Abramson IC Design Power Interface Texas Instruments +1 603.222.8519 (Office) +1 603.410.7884 (Mobile) From: Darshan, Yair [mailto:YDarshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Hi David, Thanks for the comments. Regarding comment #1: I have addressed the foot notes at the relevant places and it affected the requirements. Please see attached updated slide 10 in the cases were PD power >PSE power. Regarding comment #2: Please see slide 4 where you can find part of the answers to your question and I hope the missing data will be captured by the ad-hoc members prior the ad-hoc call. We need the information from the group as well. No doubt about it and yes, it may take some time unless everybody agrees that what is in the presentation covers our scope of interests. Yair From: Tremblay, David [mailto:david.tremblay@xxxxxx] Hi Yair, Recommended Slide Changes: · Update table on slide 9 to include footnotes 2 & 3 after the text “work” for all pertinent cells. Comments/Questions: · I suspect it will take a considerable amount of time to put together the various device lists outlined on slide 3. Will this data be captured prior to the Ad-Hoc call? Regards, From: Darshan, Yair [mailto:YDarshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Hi all, Please see attached Compatibility Matrix Ad-Hoc material for our Compatibility Matrix Ad-Hoc conference call. Meanwhile, until the formal ad-hoc conference call meeting, I'll appreciate if you review it and send your inputs over the reflector to start the discussion so we can better prepared for this meeting. I am planning to have at least one ad-hoc conference call until the IEEE802.3 Geneva Interim which its details I'll send to you within a day or two. Best Regards Yair Yair Darshan 4P-PoE Compatibility Matrix Ad-Hoc Chair. |