Hi Jeff,
Some first comments:
Slide 4:
2nd bullet. Not clear why you mention SELV etc.?
5th bullet.
- Try to specify unbalance with absolute values so positive or negative voltage differences is not important.
-The fact that lower or higher V2 that can compensate higher/lower R2 is true however the test should address it inherently to simplify the test
-To cover both points try to define mathematical desired _expression_ and then design what the test setup need to be to test it. For example; I would start to play with the following: RUNB=dV/dI. What is need to
be done so for a given requirement of worst case RUNB limit, the dV will not exceed di or equivalent method.
-I would try to replace the V1 with some fixed resistive load that represents the current during normal operation so P2PRUNB between ANY two pairs can be extracted . (P2PRUNB is defined between any two pairs).
6 bullet:
-No need to test pair unbalance. No value added. Its effect on P2PRUNB is negligible.
Slide 5:
Similar comments.
Regards.
Yair
From: Jeff Heath [mailto:jheath@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 12:11 AM
To: STDS-802-3-4PPOE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.3_4PPOE] IEEE802.3bt End to End Channel Pair to Pair Resistance Unbalance - Proposed PSE and PI Speciication
All,
Here is my proposed way to create balance specifications at the PSE and PI. I welcome any comments.
Regards,
|
Jeff Heath |
|
|
|
|
|
paper: |
402 East Carrillo Street, Suite D |
|
|
Santa Barbara, California 93101 |
|
voice: |
805.965.6400 |
|
fax:
|
805.965.1701 |
|
computer: |
|
|
|
