Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802.3_4PPOE] PAR change

Personally, I didn't have a problem with chads original, but I like allowed or permitted. Described and recommend don't  quite do it, we specify, permit/allow or disallow things in the standard

George Zimmerman
CME Consulting, Inc.
310-920-3860

On Oct 6, 2015, at 2:06 PM, Dave Dwelley <ddwelley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

John’s right - how about:

"Enhancements introduced for 4-pair systems, excluding the augmented power limits, may also be allowed for 2-pair systems.”

or 

“…permitted for 2-pair systems.”

Dave

On Oct 1, 2015, at 12:58 PM, John Skinner <john_skinner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Chad
 
One area that folks seemed to be very sensitive to is any language that could vaguely be construed to impose new requirements on 2-pair implementations.
 
Here are a couple of alternatives:
 
Enhancements introduced for 4-pair systems, excluding the augmented power limits, may be recommended for 2-pair systems. 
 
   Or
 
Enhancements introduced for 4-pair systems, excluding the augmented power limits, may be described for 2-pair systems. 
 
Regards,
 
John
 
John Skinner
Sifos Technologies, Inc.
1061 East Street, Tewksbury, MA 01876
+1 (978) 640-4900 x118
 
From: Chad Jones (cmjones) [mailto:cmjones@xxxxxxxxx] <snip>