Hi Pete,
We only have the information in the add info column which says "Open Load voltage".
That may not be sufficient, we ought to replace that by a "See 33.2.8.1" and add appropriate text that qualifies this parameter.
We can do this at D2.0/September.
That said, the TBD only applies to a test setup which we haven't defined yet. So it seems harmless to remove.
Kind regards,
Lennart
Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 17:24
To: Yseboodt, Lennart; STDS-802-3-4PPOE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [802.3_4PPOE] TBDs in D1.8
Lennart:
Is there any text that qualifies or specifies Vport_pse_diff as being applicable at any particular power load, e.g. Pclass or “any load”, etc?
Practically speaking, I believe this parameter is only important (or relevant) in a subset of cases where Pair-Pair unbalance is critical:
1) Operating at higher power levels – for example >30W because we don’t care about Pair-Pair unbalance below 30W
2) 4-Pair Powering of Single Signature PD’s
3) Operating at power levels where Iport_2P may exceed Icon/2
Regards,
Pete J
Sifos
From: Yseboodt, Lennart [mailto:lennart.yseboodt@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 5:27 AM
To: STDS-802-3-4PPOE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_4PPOE] TBDs in D1.8
Hi folks,
We neglected to remove the open TBDs for D1.8 and we need to get rid of them to proceed to D2.0.
Thankfully there is only one that needs addressing.
I will file comment to resolve these, but want to do some consensus building first.
TBD no 1 (page 102, line 16)
Proposed resolution: remove "Test Setup TBD."
TBD no 2 (page 210, line 16-18)
These TBDs were put in at request of the WG chair and should stay until we are more nearer to completion.
Proposed resolution: None
TBD no 3 (page 218, line 16)
Idem to TBD no 2. No proposed action.
Discussion ?
Lennart