Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Chris, We already have AUI-S and AUI-L for two ranges essentially of loss, not just one. Regardless, we do have more kinds of implementations needing support from the standard. Jeff From: Chris Cole <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [External Email. Be cautious of content] Dear IEEE 802.3df Participants, I trust everyone rushed to review next week's material as soon as John announced its availability, and discovered the excellent exposition by Mr. Lusted. For those with limited time and trying to decide which presentation to read, may I
kindly call your attention to: As always, Kent is gently steering us towards wisdom, which for some of us who prefer the more direct approach, is a bit too old school. What's clear is that a single large loss AUI C2M is no longer sufficient and we should write multiple specifications to adequately meet the need of mushrooming applications, specifically:
Obviously the exact loss is TBD, however a good start for the XSR value are the shorter reach examples in last year's presentation by Sam and Nathan. In off-line discussions, there has been a lot of interest in XSR's potential to save power, which we will direct into a proposal for the next meeting. For those that would like to join us in contributing or reviewing, please send me an
email so that we can put you on copy as we iterate a draft.
Chris On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:12 PM John D'Ambrosia <jdambrosia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-B400G list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-B400G&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-B400G list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-B400G&A=1 |