| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
The reason I am asking is that we are trying to implement and associated coverage and IET impacts flow run out requirements and calculating those requirements has run into some issues. And since they are not
changed in the IET draft the base 802.3 values must work, which we are finding to not be true. There are a couple of other items we have run into as well in the newer draft. There is the SMD-R and SMD-V which are used in the state machines and they are not defined. Regards Denis Beaudoin DMTS Texas Instruments
dbeaudoin@xxxxxx
W: 214-480-3287/77 M: 214-475-9193 From: Winkel, Ludwig [mailto:ludwig.winkel@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Denis, Why you are asking this? In my mind the flow control is no more needed. At least the combination makes no sense for me from the standpoint of applications. There was a similar discussion during the joint .1TSN and .3br meeting with the conclusion that flow control can be substituted by this better approach of IET
combined with the different .1TSN approaches on top. Mit freundlichen Gruessen / With best regards,
Chair of the IEEE P802.3br Task Force Co-chair of IEC SG8 Convenor of IEC SC65B/WG16 Convenor of IEC SC65C/WG17 Convenor of IEC SC65C/MT9 Convenor of CENELEC TC65X/WG1 Mail: Siemens AG , PD TI FC
|