Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802.3_ISAAC] Main conclusions from Monday's discussion of jonsson_3ISAAC_01_082823



Hi Ragnar,

 

I think there was interest in 1G downstream rate and not just multi-gig.

Also I don’t think we closed out the possibility of considering 25G.  

 

The rest of the items I agree with.

 

Thanks,

William

 

From: Ragnar Jonsson <rjonsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2023 15:02
To: STDS-802-3-ISAAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_ISAAC] Main conclusions from Monday's discussion of jonsson_3ISAAC_01_082823

 

All,

 

As promised, I am sending a short summary of the conclusion from the discussion of my presentation in the Monday meeting: https://www.ieee802.org/3/ISAAC/public/082823/jonsson_3ISAAC_01_082823.pdf

 

The main takeaways from the discussion is that the camera link physical layer needs to support the following:

- Downstream data rates should be multi-Gig Ethernet data rates up to 10Gbps

- Upstream data rate should be 100Mbps

- Cost efficient power delivery is important

- Should support both Shielded Balanced Pair and Coax

- Compatibility with existing MAC specification is important

- It is important to control latency

 

Please let us know if I am missing any other key conclusion from the discussion.

 

I am starting to work on presentations (more than one) to address the feasibility of camera link PHY that archives all of the above. As always, I would welcome any collaborators that may be interested in this subject.

 

Ragnar


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1