| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Unfortunately, I’ve had issues w/ the reflector – mostly on inbound emails getting filtered (per user, not per alias.) But George’s email did get through, I did see this, and made the change, removing instances
of the “Not Demonstrated,” text. There is some additional text on the ACT crystal topic that could be resolved with a dedicated contribution. For example, does the demonstrated implementation use an equalizer to clean up the data-dependent
jitter? Can tests be run at worst-case cable lengths (maybe 15m, maybe higher as proposed by TJ), lower voltages, higher temps (basically whatever you conceive as a possible mission profile). In my mind, those kind of experiments put the issue to rest. Best regards, Claude From: George Zimmerman <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The statement was made that ACT hadn’t demonstrated crystalless. Please see slide 3 of
https://www.ieee802.org/3/dm/public/0725/wu_3dm_01a_072925.pdf , presented to this group. There may be others. This statement should be corrected. George Zimmerman, Ph.D. President & Principal CME Consulting, Inc. Experts in Advanced PHYsical Communications 310-920-3860 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1 |