[802.3_ISAAC] proposed straw polls on objectives

[George Zimmerman <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I would suggest the following straw polls (sending to the group to aid quick discussion).  Note that I’m trying to keep these brief to give us information on what to do next:

1. I support the objective changes, as presented in zimmerman_obj_3dm_03a_03082026.pdf (Y / N / A)
2. I support the objective changes, as presented in zimmerman_obj_3dm_03a_030820206.pdf with the phrase “, with concurrent transmission in both directions,” removed from the cl 201 objective (Y/N/A)
3. I support the objective changes, as presented in zimmerman_obj_3dm_03a_030820206.pdf with the phrase “, with concurrent transmission in both directions,” removed from the cl 201 objective, AND with some TBD language paralleling “optimized for end-node cameras” added to the Cl 202 objective  (Y/N/A)
4. I believe we should not adopt objectives for 2 PHY clauses at this time (Y/N/A)

George Zimmerman, Ph.D.

President & Principal

CME Consulting, Inc.

Experts in Advanced PHYsical Communications

george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

310-920-3860

 

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1