Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802.3_ISAAC] EZ comments to pull (pages 1 through 20)



Hi George,

I have updated the database to pull 1, 210, 191, 192, and 124.  I'm not sure how 191 and 192 ended up "EZ".  I suspect that was done early and then we changed the response and forgot to change the topic.

I don't think 240 and 241 conflict with 235.  240 and 241 fix missing or extra spaces.  235 adds a missing term "z" in all the RS-FEC(x,y,z).  

Unless someone objects, I won't pull 152.

You had #1 in both the definitely pull and possibly pull lists, so I have pulled it from the "EZ" bucket.

Thanks,

Natalie Wienckowski
In-Vehicle Networking Solutions LLC
natalie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
586-247-0846


On Sun, Apr 5, 2026 at 3:51 PM George Zimmerman <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Definitely Pull: 1, 210, 191, 192, and 124

 

Possibly pull 152, 1, 240, and 241  (if Editor is good with these being handlable under editorial license, I’m fine with it too, and we don’t need to pull them)

 

See notes below

-george

 

Comment 152:

The response has several typos.  If these are within editorial license, we can leave it in, but just to note the proposed text has the following typos (fuction should be function and controls should be control).

 

Comment 1:

Since, as the editor has pointed out, there was a prior change (in 802.df) to 8 bits for the PMA/PMD type selection, the 802.3dm text should not show a change in the “Bits” column.  Additionally, the table was modified by 802.3dk-2026 – which should be added to the editing instruction.  This comment should be used to correct those errors in the draft. – PULL.

 

Comment 210: Pull.  – the usage is to have underscores when you are referring to a variable name (including signals, messages, etc.), but not when it is plain English. The text at line 22 that is being changed is not speaking to the variable, but rather just to plain English. “It obtains block lock to PHY frames…” is correct.  It is the text at line 27 (which is parallel) that should be changed “It obtains block_lock to the PHY frames” to omit the underscore.

 

Comment 240 & 241: even these are only spaces, the responses needs to be harmonized to 235. – this may be doable in editorial license.

 

Pull 191 & 192 – these have TFTF (which I assume is supposed to be TFTD?)  - they’ can’t be EZ….  There is a decision and discussion to occur, and this is a technical change.

 

Pull 124 – “ensure” is a reserved word for IEEE SA mandatory editorial coordination, to be avoided.  Let’s fix this right by rewording now. There are many possible decent substitutes, and we all agree “insure” is wrong.  Going with a one-word change is probably best – Suggest, change “insure” to “establish”: “To establish a consistent methodology on measuring the delays is used by all implementations, the following points in the data stream are used.”

 

 

--- I’ll probably have more later, I’ve only gotten to page 20 and am going to enjoy some of my sunday

 

 

 

George Zimmerman, Ph.D.

President & Principal

CME Consulting, Inc.

Experts in Advanced PHYsical Communications

george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

310-920-3860

 


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1