Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802.3_ISAAC] Comments 125, 126

Hi George, Natalie,

 

I’m good with “establish”.

 

Thanks,

William

 

From: George Zimmerman <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 9:34 AM
To: STDS-802-3-ISAAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.3_ISAAC] Comments 125, 126

 

William – we changed “insure” to “establish” in another comment today – we’re not buying an insurance policy, and “ensure” is a word IEEE SA would prefer we avoid (it’s a trigger word for MEC).

 

Other than that, this is good.

 

George Zimmerman, Ph.D.

President & Principal

CME Consulting, Inc.

Experts in Advanced PHYsical Communications

george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

310-920-3860

 

From: William Lo <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 9:01 AM
To: STDS-802-3-ISAAC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_ISAAC] Comments 125, 126

 

Hi Natalie,

 

Here is the proposed resolution to comment 125, 126. 

 

Page 249

 

Change lines 21-23:

“To insure a consistent methodology on measuring the delays is used by all implementations, the following points in the

data stream are used.”

 

To:

“To insure a consistent methodology, the following delays are defined.:

 

Change lines 25, 28:

“measured:

To:

“defined”

 

 

Note that in page 250 line 1 we may want to leave the word “measurable”, but the TF can discuss this.

 

Thanks,

William

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1