Re: [802.3_NGBASET] BQ & BZ proposed comment responses are now posted

[George Zimmerman <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Theo - I want to remind everyone that the editors recommendations are just that - recommendations. We do our best on a relatively quick review of a lot of comments. I personally want to thank those who take the time to read the proposed responses and think about them together. It will help us all make a better standard.

George Zimmerman

CME Consulting, Inc.

310-920-3860

George@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Nov 7, 2015, at 4:42 PM, Brillhart, Theodore <Theodore.Brillhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Adding the reflector for everyone’s benefit.

 

-TB

 

From: Brillhart, Theodore
Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2015 4:40 PM
To: 'Chalupsky, David' <david.chalupsky@xxxxxxxxx>; George Zimmerman <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: BQ & BZ proposed comment responses are now posted

 

Hello Dave, George,

 

I'd like to comment on the proposed response to my comment #55. I would completely agree with the proposed response if my comment were specifying any requirements for cabling that weren’t already in the annex. However what I propose with this comment is to simply translate the values for CM Vpp and DM Vpp that are listed in the table now, into their equivalent TCL values (i.e. TCL = 20Log₁₀(CM/DM)). The cabling in this test set-up is the only significant source of mode conversion and can be pre-tested to aid the user in setting up the experiment effectively the first time. No need to set the entire thing up, calibrate the clamp, take multiple measurements at the baluns only to find the CM/DM voltage requirements have not been met, toss out the cabling, and start over.

 

I’m very sorry if my comment did not make this clear to begin with. No new requirements.

 

-Theo

 

 

From: Chalupsky, David [mailto:david.chalupsky@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, November 6, 2015 3:40 PM
To: STDS-802-3-NGBASET@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_NGBASET] BQ & BZ proposed comment responses are now posted

 

Dear Colleagues,

Proposed comment responses for P802.3bq D2.3 and P802.3bz D1.1 are now posted.

For both projects our editorial team has created an “EZ Bucket” of comments that we intend to approve with a single motion (one for each project).

Please review the EZ bucket files.  If you would like your comment removed from the EZ bucket and discussed separately, please notify me and our Chief Editor, George Zimmerman.

 

P802.3bq comments: http://www.ieee802.org/3/bq/comments/index.html

P802.3bz comments: http://www.ieee802.org/3/bz/comments/index.html

 

Many thanks to the reviewers and to our editorial team for providing proposed responses.

Thanks,

David Chalupsky

Chair, IEEE P802.3bq 25G/40GBASE-T Task Force

Chair, IEEE P802.3bz 2.5G/5GBASE-T Task Force