Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

[802.3_NGBASET] Question about Alien Cross Talk Rejection Test

To: STDS-802-3-NGBASET@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_NGBASET] Question about Alien Cross Talk Rejection Test
From: Jerome-yu <jerome-yu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:56:56 +0000
Accept-language: zh-TW, en-US
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-802-3-NGBASET>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-802-3-NGBASET>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-802-3-NGBASET-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-3-NGBASET-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-802-3-NGBASET-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Reply-to: Jerome-yu <jerome-yu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AdHGyExDXyYNe3zgTImhS48MccH5Qg==
Thread-topic: Question about Alien Cross Talk Rejection Test

Hi Hossein,

According to your comment at 802d3bz_D1p1_Clause_FINAL.pdf #6.

"should result in 32 dB of Salz SNR. When the insertion loss of the channel is at the limit line

defined in 126-10, noise power spectral density is -137 dBm/Hz and -127 dBm/Hz for 5G and

2.5G, respectivley"

The white noise level of alien cross talk rejection test is designed to meet Salz SNR 32dB. Since Salz SNR requirement has been changed to 28dB at D2.1, this white noise level is not appropriate for 5G and 2.5G. Should the noise level be reviewed ?

Sincerely,

Jerome ext. 15413

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [802.3_NGBASET] Question about Alien Cross Talk Rejection Test
  - From: Hossein Sedarat

Prev by Date: Re: [802.3_NGBASET] Question about Alien Cross Talk Rejection Test
Next by Date: [802.3_NGBASET] IEEE 802.3bz 2.5/5GBASE-T TF Arch AdHoc conf call - Monday June 20th 9:00am PDT.
Previous by thread: [802.3_NGBASET] IEEE 802.3bz 2.5/5GBASE-T TF Arch AdHoc conf call - Monday June 20th 9:00am PDT.
Next by thread: Re: [802.3_NGBASET] Question about Alien Cross Talk Rejection Test
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread