| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Brad, Thanks for the input. I agree it was a very productive Telco and look forward to working with the group for further progress. These are good suggestions. I will construct a new language for channel modeling in the preliminary objectives. Additionally, I should clarify for the group that these objectives intend to cover for both Automotive
and Industrial Ethernet. The reach requirements are different but we need to consider both environments for broad market potential.
Thanks, -Mehmet From: Brad Booth [mailto:Brad_Booth@xxxxxxxx]
Mehmet, Thanks again for arranging today’s conference call. Lots of great discussion. George Zimmerman and I were talking off-line about potential objectives. Objectives are tough because the study group needs them to bound the scope of the project without limiting the potential for the task force
to consider multiple solutions. With that in mind, here’s some potential considerations: Define a twisted-pair copper cabling channel model(s) that supports: ·
Fewer than four twisted-pairs ·
X connectors Define a 1000 Mb/s PHY that would support channels of: ·
At least 40 m in an automotive environment ·
At least x m in an industrial environment The number of connectors still needs to be defined, and there also needs to be some presentations around the reach requirements for the markets/applications. It would also be interesting to get feedback from those participating in the study group about whether or not the study group might wish to consider a reach for the shorter-reach consumer market. Cheers, Brad Booth Director, Network Architecture Social Media and Community Professional Dell | Office of the CTO, Networking office +1-512-723-7106,
mobile +1-503-830-9366 |