Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Yair,
Sorry for being late in answering your
questions:
Type testing requirements for communication networks
and systems in substations are described in IEC 61850 Part 3: General
requirements.
Clause 5.7 handles the environmental conditions for EMI
immunity including conducted disturbances/surges (5.7.1.2):
Surges as per IEC 61000-4-5 (test levels to class
4) with waveforms 1,2/50 µs and 10/700 µs and peaks up to 4
kV.
Conditions to be met (5.7.4.2):
The equipment shall be considered to have passed
the tests if - during, or as a result of, the tests - all of the following
conditions are met for the equipment and the connected
devices:
With best
regards, From: Darshan, Yair [mailto:YDarshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Donnerstag, 19. Juli 2012 08:52 To: Winkel, Ludwig; STDS-802-3-RTPGE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [802.3_RTPGE] Fw: [802.3_RTPGE] PoE ad hoc - new information Hi
Ludwig, Thanks for
the info. Few
questions: 1.
How the 4KV surge on signal lines is
applied? Through capacitive clamp other contact? On each wire separately
relative to chassis? 2.
What do you mean by "PoE channels will be
treated like non-PoE channels"? Thanks Yair Darshan
Yair Chair Power
over HDBaseT Subcommittee HDBaseT
Alliance Chief R&D
Engineer Analog
Mixed Signal Group Microsemi
Corporation 1
Hanagar St., P.O. Box 7220 Cell:
+972-54-4893019 E-mail: <mailto:ydarshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. From: Winkel, Ludwig
[mailto:ludwig.winkel@xxxxxxxxxxx] Dave et
al, The
requirements from Industrial Automation according the question list
FYI: 1. Is
PoE as defined in Clause 33 of the current standard adequate for
RTPGE? Yes, IEEE
802.3at is adequate in principle, some additional requirements
exist:
The EEE
for industrial automation is done by using a higher layer protocol for
Device-shut-down, not by switch off the power. With
that we can daisy chaining the power to decouple the topology from the logical
grouping of devices that can be switched off. With
best regards, From: Dave Dwelley
[mailto:ddwelley1@xxxxxxxxx] All
- Another
clarification - discussion about a CFI in particular is out of scope in this
meeting. Dave -----
Forwarded Message ----- All
- A couple
of clarifications: the meeting this afternoon is intended to address all PoE
topics, not just RTPGE-focused topics. The goal is to decide whether it makes
sense to hold a new CFI to address all PoE topics, including RTPGE, PoE++, and
any other relevant PoE topics. Please invite anyone who can contribute (and is
present in San Diego) who is not on the RTPGE
reflector. The
RTPGE meeting is expected to break around 2:30 today, so this PoE meeting will
start immediately afterwards. Meet in the lobby outside Manchester
D.
|