Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802.3_SPMD] Notes on some EZ comments...

Tim, good catch on #228. Thanks for reviewing and sending out to the reflector.

 

Val & George, as 228 was my comment, Tim is 100% right in saying this is what I requested in my comment. We can pull from the EZ bucket (and move to editorial) or we can fix the proposed response and leave in the EZ bucket – your choice.

 

Regards,

 

Chad Jones

Principal Engineer, Cisco Systems

Executive Secretary, IEEE 802.3 Working Group

Chair, IEEE P802.3da Task Force

Principal, NFPA 70 CMP3

 

From: Tim Baggett <000015f075877453-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, January 6, 2025 at 4:40 PM
To: STDS-802-3-SPMD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-3-SPMD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [802.3_SPMD] Notes on some EZ comments...

 

On further examination, I’ve captured the following notes on the EZ comments below.

 

@George, Val – I’m not sure if you want to update some of the proposed resolutions or pull them from the bucket. Editor’s choice :)

 

Comment #2

P93 L24 – change multiple instances of “dc” to “DC”.

 

It then follows that “ac” in L36 of the same paragraph (and globally) should also be changed to “AC”.

 

Comment #228

The suggested remedy is:

Replace "and" with "while" in 3 spots"

"During event 3, Type 0 MPDs respond and Type 1 while Type mixed MPDs do not. During

event 4, Type 1 MPDs respond and Type 0 while Type mixed MPDs do not. During event 5,

Type mixed MPDs respond while Type 0 and Type 1 MPDs do not."

 

I believe the wrong “and” was replaced with “while” in two spots (see red). Resulting text should then be:

Replace "and" with "while" in 3 spots"

"During event 3, Type 0 MPDs respond while Type 1 and Type mixed MPDs do not. During

event 4, Type 1 MPDs respond while Type 0 and Type mixed MPDs do not. During event 5,

Type mixed MPDs respond while Type 0 and Type 1 MPDs do not."

 

Comment #124

 

This is really about a proposed maintenance rather than a 3.da comment to be addressed in the interim meeting.

 

The editor’s note in the proposed response suggests maintenance on Clause 30.16.1.1.2 aPLCAStatus. This entity is presently an ENUMERATION taking the values TRUE or FALSE. The note suggests changing theis entity to BOOLEAN. However, as described, this entity maps to the plca_status variable in 148.4.6.2 which takes on the values OK or FAIL. For consistency I therefore believe it may be best to leave 30.16.1.1.2 aPLCAStatus as an ENUMERATION but taking the values OK or FAIL.

 

Comment #176 is on P125, not P124.

 

Comment #111 (Editorial, not EZ) is on P135, not P133.

 

-- 

Tim Baggett

Technical Staff Engineer - Applications

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Microchip Technology, Inc.

Automotive Information Systems

8601 Ranch Rd 2222, Park Centre, Bldg. 3, Austin, TX 78730

Office: 512-334-8450

Tim.Baggett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx www.microchip.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-SPMD list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-SPMD&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-SPMD list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-SPMD&A=1