| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Tim looking at this it doesn’t appear we need to pull the last 3 (124, 176, and 111) since it doesn’t change the action in the resolution.
I will pull 228 - I believe you are correct, and pull comment 2 as well (I have to do some checking elsewhere on this…)
George Zimmerman, Ph.D.
President & Principal
CME Consulting, Inc.
Experts in Advanced PHYsical Communications
george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
310-920-3860
On Jan 6, 2025, at 1:40 PM, Tim Baggett <000015f075877453-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On further examination, I’ve captured the following notes on the EZ comments below.
@George, Val – I’m not sure if you want to update some of the proposed resolutions or pull them from the bucket. Editor’s choice :) Comment #2 P93 L24 – change multiple instances of “dc” to “DC”. It then follows that “ac” in L36 of the same paragraph (and globally) should also be changed to “AC”. Comment #228 The suggested remedy is: Replace "and" with "while" in 3 spots" "During event 3, Type 0 MPDs respond
and Type 1
while Type mixed MPDs do not. During event 4, Type 1 MPDs respond and
Type 0 while
Type mixed MPDs do not. During event 5, Type mixed MPDs respond
while Type 0 and Type 1 MPDs do not." I believe the wrong “and” was replaced with “while” in two spots (see red). Resulting text should then be: Replace "and" with "while" in 3 spots" "During event 3, Type 0 MPDs respond
while Type 1
and Type mixed MPDs do not. During event 4, Type 1 MPDs respond while
Type 0 and
Type mixed MPDs do not. During event 5, Type mixed MPDs respond
while Type 0 and Type 1 MPDs do not." Comment #124 This is really about a proposed maintenance rather than a 3.da comment to be addressed in the interim meeting. The editor’s note in the proposed response suggests maintenance on Clause 30.16.1.1.2 aPLCAStatus. This entity is presently an ENUMERATION taking the values TRUE or FALSE. The note suggests changing theis entity to BOOLEAN. However, as
described, this entity maps to the plca_status variable in 148.4.6.2 which takes on the values OK or FAIL. For consistency I therefore believe it may be best to leave 30.16.1.1.2 aPLCAStatus as an ENUMERATION but taking the values OK or FAIL. Comment #176 is on P125, not P124. Comment #111 (Editorial, not EZ) is on P135, not P133. --
Tim Baggett
Technical Staff Engineer - Applications --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microchip Technology, Inc. Automotive Information Systems 8601 Ranch Rd 2222, Park Centre, Bldg. 3, Austin, TX 78730 Office: 512-334-8450 Tim.Baggett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.microchip.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-SPMD list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-SPMD&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-SPMD list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-SPMD&A=1 |