| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Steve The BWA reflector from 2012 was archived as part of that effort. If you go and look at the archive you will see that there are no emails before today’s other than adam’s. So it may be a reuse of existing name at most. No one was automacially subscribed to the new list – if so – i wouldn’t have had to send out the email below. john From: Trowbridge, Steve (Nokia - US) <steve.trowbridge@xxxxxxxxx> Hi John, I think Marek’s point was that this is not a new reflector, and in fact it seemed to be a reflector to which I was already subscribed. Was this the same reflector as used for the original (2012) BWA, or have you told us about this in previous meeting cycles? Or were all subscribers to NGECDC automagically subscribed to the new list? Regards, Steve From: John DAmbrosia <jdambrosia@xxxxxxxxx> Marek The email was sent to both the NGECDC and the BWA reflector – so when we switched over would be recorded in the BWA reflector. So the answer to your question is yes. John From: Marek Hajduczenia <mxhajduczenia@xxxxxxxxx> John, instructions (http://www.ieee802.org/3/ad_hoc/bwa2/reflector.html) point to the very same reflector address: subscribe stds-802-3-BWA <yourfirstname> <yourlastname> - is this intended? Marek On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 10:17 AM John DAmbrosia <jdambrosia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-BWA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-BWA&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-BWA list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-BWA&A=1 |