RE: [10GBASE-CX4] March 11 request for change
Hi John,
Given our "opportunity" to do a more thorough review of the
comments and resolutions, we can look at the existing comment
base and see if your proposal fits within the scope of that
work.
Regards,
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grow, Bob [mailto:bob.grow@intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 11:22 AM
> To: John DeAndrea; stds-802-3-10GBCX4@ieee.org
> Subject: RE: [10GBASE-CX4] March 11 request for change
>
>
>
> John:
>
> You should have submitted a comment (as a non-voter) during
> WG ballot, not after the ballot has closed. If the TF wants
> to consider a change, they have the option to enter a comment
> during comment resolution (if no similar comment was
> submitted during ballot), but they have no obligation to do so.
>
> Bob Grow
> Chair, IEEE 802.3 Working Group
> bob.grow@ieee.org
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John DeAndrea [mailto:John_DeAndrea@iTerraC.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 5:50 AM
> To: stds-802-3-10GBCX4@ieee.org
> Subject: [10GBASE-CX4] March 11 request for change
>
>
>
> Im made a request for change to Table 54.6, subclause
> 54.7.3.4 to balance positive and negative values,
> specifically +1.9 and -1.9 volts.
>
> The old values still appear.
>
>