Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Adam Please see my comments below in red. Healey, Adam B (Adam) wrote: I do agree with TP-1 and TP-4 definition. Adam, I was not advocating specifying a backplane connector and looks like based on the the definition of goergen_03_0704 you already have connector as part of the channel. The part I am puzzled is the return loss associated with current channel model "-14 dB up to 15 GHz". Based on my data and experience specifying such low return loss is not practical unless you introduce significant loss on the daughter-board. With 14 dB return loss at TP1/TP4 toward the channel you are practically ignoring the most significant effect "double reflection between the connector and the IC"! Thanks, Ali
|
begin:vcard fn:Ali Ghiasi n:Ghiasi;Ali org:Broadcom adr;dom:;;3151 Zanker Road;San Jose;CA;95134 email;internet:aghiasi@broadcom.com title:Chief Architect tel;work:(408)922-7423 tel;cell:(949)290-8103 url:http://www.broadcom.com version:2.1 end:vcard