Re: [BP] Channel model library updated

[Joe M Abler <abler@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Which Molex channels should we simulate with?  There are the original m1 version of the files with xtalk, there's a 2/21 updated m1 SE version  without xtalk, and then there's a 2/21 new m2 version.  They all have the same channel naming so the spreadsheet is fine, but we all need to be sure we're working with the same files.

Thanks,        Joe


Joe Abler                                                             abler@us.ibm.com
IBM Systems & Technology Group            919-254-0573
High Speed Serial Link Solutions               919-254-9616 (fax)
3039 Cornwallis Road                                                                 
Research Triangle Park, NC  27709

"Altmann, Michael W" <michael.w.altmann@INTEL.COM> Sent by: owner-stds-802-3-blade@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG 02/22/2005 02:51 AM Please respond to "Altmann, Michael W"

To:        STDS-802-3-BLADE@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG         cc:                 Subject:        Re: [BP] Channel model library updated

All,
 
It seems from the updated Molex release that their channel models are still identifiable using the current names in the signaling spreadsheet.  From this, I don't think any changes should be necessary to the second page of the workbook.
 
If there is disagreement or discussion necessary on this, please let me know.
 
.../Mike

---

From: owner-stds-802-3-blade@ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-3-blade@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Healey, Adam B (Adam)
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 7:15 AM
To: STDS-802-3-BLADE@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [BP] Channel model library updated

IEEE P802.3ap Task Force Members,
 
Please note that the channel model library has been re-organized updated with contributions from David McCallum and Gary Oleynick.  
 
http://ieee802.org/3/ap/public/channel_model/index.html
 
Thanks to Molex and FCI for making this data available to the Task Force.
 
Thank you,
 
Adam Healey
Chair, IEEE P802.3ap Task Force