The line
didn’t only tilt. It also shifted. John D looked at a few channels as I
attached. If we shift, it’s got an impact for KX and
KX4.
…Rich
From: Joe M
Abler [mailto:abler@US.IBM.COM]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 1:15
PM
To:
STDS-802-3-BLADE@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [BP] Interference tolerance
test channels
The new channel
appears to be inline with what we stated - a tilt of the line from DC to about a
3dB drop at 5GHz. Why do you feel the lower frequencies need to stay
fixed?
Thanks,
Joe
Joe Abler
abler@us.ibm.com
IBM Systems & Technology Group
919-254-0573
High Speed Serial Link
Solutions 919-254-9616
(fax)
3039 Cornwallis
Road
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
|
|
"Mellitz, Richard"
<richard.mellitz@INTEL.COM>
01/16/2006 10:41
AM
Please respond to
"Mellitz,
Richard" |
To:
STDS-802-3-BLADE@listserv.ieee.org
cc:
Subject: Re: [BP] Interference tolerance
test channels |
Hi Charles,
DC and low
freq's went down way to much! Can you create a model with the
same losses at
say 1GHz or so and 2 dB less at 5GHz? I thought that's
what we agreed.
...
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Moore
[mailto:charles.moore@avagotech.com]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 8:42 PM
To:
STDS-802-3-BLADE@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [BP] Interference tolerance test
channels
guys,
I propose that we use the model
ITTC_23.s4p for reduced attenuation
EIT modeling. If it really will not
work, ITTC_20.s4p is available as a
bail out channel. If it looks too
easy, let me know and i will step it
up just
a tad.
The numbers refer to the fitted attenuation at 5.15...GHz.
charles
--
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
Charles Moore
| Avago
Technologies
| Image Solutions Division
|
charles.moore@avagotech.com
|
(970)
288-4561
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|