Re: [BP] reminder: Channel model ad-hoc phone conference Wednesday April 19

[Magesh Valliappan <mageshv@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Here is an attached PDF, showing simulation results with different
combinations of 
XTLK transmit amplitude and equalization settings. 
 
The results indicate that aggressor amplitude and equalization has to be
constrained 
to enable reasonable interoperability on these channels. 

Magesh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Moore [mailto:charles.moore@AVAGOTECH.COM] 
> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 12:18 PM
> To: STDS-802-3-BLADE@listserv.ieee.org
> Subject: [BP] reminder: Channel model ad-hoc phone conference 
> Wednesday April 19
> 
> When: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 12:00 PM-2:00 PM MDT (US & Canada).
>                                   2:00 PM-4:00 PM EDT
> Where: pass code=874817
> 
> USA dial:  866-844-3871
> If you are outside the US and want to dial in, please let me 
> know, the list of non-US numbers is larger than i want to 
> include in this memo.
> 
> I am looking for presentations on:
> 
>        1.  Rx interference tolerance test, either simulations 
> bearing on
>            correct sinusoidal EIT baseline values to use or 
> fleshing out
>            of broad band interference test.
> 
>        2.  Presentations showing that with supportable Rx interference
>            tolerance specs our existing channel specification will
>            (or will not) allow interoperability with reasonable
>            confidence.
> 
>        3.  Assuming a negative on 2, what changes in the channel
>            specifications will provide a reasonable confidence of
>            interoperability?
> 
> 
>                    charles
> 
> 
> -- 
> |--------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |       Charles Moore
> |       Avago Technologies
> |       ISD
> |       charles.moore@avagotech.com
> |       (970) 288-4561
> |--------------------------------------------------------------------|
> 
>

kr_xtlk_ber.pdf