Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
(Message sent via IEEE Standards webmail) ----------------------------------------- Presenter = Ed Harstead Affiliation = Nokia SenderEmail = ED.HARSTEAD@xxxxxxxxx Title = Wavelength plan comparison: proposed decision process Description = Simplification/replacement of wavelength plan comparison model harstead_3ca_3_1116 The decision to adopt 1+3 architectures more or less eliminated Plan C, narrowing to Plans A, B, and D. Of the original decision criteria, only a few remained that differentiated the 3 plans. What remains in Plans A, B, and D are two schemes for downstream and two schemes for upstream, and itâ??s more useful to take decisions for the two directions (more or less) independently downstream plan decision: O-band vs. C-band upstream plan decision: WDM vs. TDM co-existence with 10G EPON Time = 30 min. ----------------------------------------- (End of IEEE Standards webmail message)
Attachment:
harstead_3ca_3_0117.pdf
Description: Binary data