Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Those are valid points.
As this plan D is merely just another example, I don’t mind modifying it to some other plan.
Frank E> From: John Johnson [mailto:john.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Frank, The version of Plan D which is shown will not work due to non-degenerate FWM. It may be possible to find a non-uniform channel plan that works but it will take a little time to prove. The
first plot below is a first cut that seems to work. I don't think it will be possible to find a working plan that straddles the zero dispersion window if one of the channels is uncooled due to the wide range of FWM frequencies (see 2nd plot). For the purposes of illustrating coexistence in the liaison, we may want to show the non-uniform plan below or a simpler LAN-WDM Plan D with all four channels in O+ band. Non-uniform plan: 1270, 1295, 1326, 1340nm with 3nm passband Non-uniform plan with uncooled 1270nm All channels in O+ band (no FWM possible): CS = 1.2THz, PB = 3nm Regards, John On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:23 AM, frank effenberger <frank.effenberger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: All,
Please review this, and we can discuss during our motion time in the afternoon.
Sincerely, Frank Effenberger VP Fixed Access Lab Futurewei Technologies |