Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
I agree that separate DBA domains for 10G and 25G upstream is desirable. In pure 50G greenfield we already have a mechanism—just use US0-A and US0-B (harstead_3ca_1_0917). Marek’s proposal is to extend this capability to the 10G PON brownfield co-existence scenario.
The disadvantages that I see:
Ed
From: Marek Hajduczenia [mailto:mxhajduczenia@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 4:13 PM
To: STDS-802-3-NGEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [802.3_NGEPON] Upstream Wavelength Plan
That might James' opinion. I do not share it. We have enough spectrum to optionally allow WDM coexistence between 25G and 10G systems.
At the end of the day, I personally do not care about new 10G upstream, but only about making both 25G channels equally challenging and limit their dispersion penalty. I do know though that the optional ability to do 10G and 1G upstream separation in today's system is a saving grace in many deployments where these systems are overlapped on the same fiber strand. I do not see any advance of doing the overlap if we can have some separation between these systems
M
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:08 PM, John Johnson <john.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Marek,
zhang_dezhi_3ca_2a_1117 proposed the principal that different rates in the same PON generation should share spectrum by TDM. I think that this principal should apply to 25G and 10G (using 25G protocol) upstream.
Ed, please add me to your list.
Regards,
John
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Marek Hajduczenia <mxhajduczenia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ed et al.,
Here are two versions of what I was suggesting, depending on how we want to stack red 25/10G options
Please include me in the discussion chain.
Thanks
M
From: Harstead, Ed (Nokia - US) [mailto:ed.harstead@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 4, 2018 12:48 PM
To: STDS-802-3-NGEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_NGEPON] Upstream Wavelength Plan
All,
Per the discussion on today’s call: For anyone interested in joining the small group working to achieve consensus on the upstream wavelength plan, please send me an email.
Ed
From: Curtis Knittle [mailto:C.Knittle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 4:09 PM
To: STDS-802-3-NGEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_NGEPON] 1/4/18 IEEE 802.3ca (100G-EPON) consensus building meeting agenda
Dear Colleagues,
We have two contributions for consensus-building meeting on January 4, 2018:
- Upstream Wavelength Plan - Ed Harstead
- Upstream Burst Structure – Marek Hajduczenia
Meeting time is 11:30 – 1:00 Mountain Standard Time. Zoom details are below.
Curtis
Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://cablelabs.zoom.us/j/804971785
Or iPhone one-tap :
US: +16699006833,,804971785# or +16465588656,,804971785#
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 558 8656
Meeting ID: 804 971 785
International numbers available: https://cablelabs.zoom.us/zoomconference?m=P8kmLi3Ns-dj0dUo8wlHA03Ja5cqdVFx
Or an H.323/SIP room system:
H.323:
162.255.37.11 (US West)
162.255.36.11 (US East)
221.122.88.195 (China)
115.114.131.7 (India)
213.19.144.110 (EMEA)
202.177.207.158 (Australia)
209.9.211.110 (Hong Kong)
64.211.144.160 (Brazil)
69.174.57.160 (Canada)
Meeting ID: 804 971 785
Curtis Knittle
VP Wired Technologies – R&D
CableLabs
desk: +1-303-661-3851
mobile: +1-303-589-6869
Stay up to date with CableLabs: Read the blog and follow us on Twitter