| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Only noticed two items of importance: 1)
Pg 1/35 line 53 “Nx25G-EPONs using the nominal bit rate of 10, 25, or 25 Gb/s use a mandatory FEC function defined in Clause 142 in any direction.”
Probably not for 10G and the 2nd “25” should be “50” I suspect. 2)
For Fig 56-5a pg 2/36 We should add a note to these figures that 10G US will not use 25GMII but 10GMII in US. Let me know if this needs to be a separate
comment. Best Regards Duane From: Marek Hajduczenia [mailto:mxhajduczenia@xxxxxxxxx]
Dear colleagues, Attached please find the proposed changes against Clause 56 to accommodate Nx25G-EPON in the EFM architecture. All changes to Clause 56 material (where needed) are tracked in terms of additions and deletion. Material that does not need
to be modified is NOT included in this contribution. I plan to submit a comment against draft D1.1 (once published) including this material as a contribution towards the draft. Please review and provide feedback. Your review is more than welcome. regards Marek To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-NGEPON list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-NGEPON&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-NGEPON list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-NGEPON&A=1 |