Marek,
The ES5 PICS should reference 141.8.5. Sorry for the typo.
-Glen
From: Marek Hajduczenia [mailto:mxhajduczenia@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 1:06 PM
To: 'Glen Kramer' <glen.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-3-NGEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Homework for March 2019 meeting (PICS)
Thank you, Glen
I will address these two comments in the next revision of the PICS
Regards
MareK
From: Glen Kramer <glen.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 2:01 PM
To: mxhajduczenia@xxxxxxxxx; STDS-802-3-NGEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Homework for March 2019 meeting (PICS)
Marek,
In PMD clause, this PICS item needs revision. There are two separate requirements that got mixed into a single PICS item.
The text in141.8.4 says nothing about labeling:
Implementations shall be declared as compliant over one or both complete ranges, or not so declared (compliant over parts of these ranges or another temperature range).
This declaration is always required, so “If required” text is not applicable either.
I would define this item as follows:
ES4 | Operating temperature range | 141.8.4 | The operating temperature range is declared | M |
There is a separate labeling requirement for operation temperature range labeling in 141.8.5, but it is only for the field-pluggable components:
Each field-pluggable component shall be clearly labeled with its operating temperature range over which compliance is ensured.
This should be reflected in a separate PICS line:
ES5 | Operating temperature range label | 141.8.4 | Is provided for field-pluggable components | M |
Thanks,
-Glen
From: Marek Hajduczenia [mailto:mxhajduczenia@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 11:57 AM
To: STDS-802-3-NGEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: 'Glen Kramer' <glen.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Curtis (CableLabs) <c.knittle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Homework for March 2019 meeting (PICS)
Dear colleagues,
Thank you for all the comments and suggestions received on the call today (1/31). Attached please find updated PICS files accommodating all comments received to date.
Regards
Marek
From: Marek Hajduczenia <mxhajduczenia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 12:07 PM
To: 'STDS-802-3-NGEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <STDS-802-3-NGEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: 'Glen Kramer' <glen.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Curtis (CableLabs) <c.knittle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Homework for March 2019 meeting (PICS)
Dear colleagues,
Attached please find updated PICS files accommodating all comments received to date. I plan to go over these files on the upcoming Thursday consensus building call.
Regards
Marek
From: Marek Hajduczenia <mxhajduczenia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 3:12 PM
To: 'STDS-802-3-NGEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <STDS-802-3-NGEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: 'Glen Kramer' <glen.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Curtis (CableLabs) <c.knittle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Homework for March 2019 meeting (PICS)
Dear colleagues,
I have completed the initial version of PICS items based on published D1.5 (http://www.ieee802.org/3/ca/private/drafts/draft_ver.shtml?D1_5). Attached please find *just* PICS for individual Clauses (141, 142, 143, and 144) in individual files, as contributions for the next meeting. I will be submitting a comment against D1.5 to bring these contributions. However, I would like to make sure that the format, content, and organization is acceptable.
Please note also that some “shall” statements in draft are *not* covered in these PICS, primarily due to overlap (there are several cases where requirements are repeated, a comment to clean that up will be submitted against D1.5) or the given section being slated for update / rewrite in next draft version.
All comments are welcome. I would appreciate feedback in the next 1-2 weeks to give me time to update the proposed files and re-distribute them for one more preview cycle.
Thank you
Marek
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-NGEPON list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-NGEPON&A=1