Dear colleagues,
In the process of implementing some of the comments, I came across two comments (see below) that I believe need to revisited tomorrow to make sure we do not have contradictory changes in approved responses.
In the case of comment #181, another comment (#264) overrides the state diagram in question to align (fix) vector indexing. I believe this comment should be labelled AIP and pointed back to #264 for actual changes to the SD in question
In comment #182, http://www.ieee802.org/3/ca/public/meeting_archive/2019/07/kramer_3ca_4_0719.pdf introduces changes to the ProcessTimestamp function definition, but does not update the description of the function itself, leading to discrepancy between variable names and what is actually being done within the function. I believe a ~5 minutes’ long look at the text and live updates will help us avoid technical conflict.
Regards
Marek Hajduczenia
P802.3ca Task Force Chief Editor
From: Marek Hajduczenia <mxhajduczenia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2019 7:04 AM
To: 'STDS-802-3-NGEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <STDS-802-3-NGEPON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: 'Glen Kramer' <glen.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Curtis (CableLabs) <c.knittle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: D2.0 comments, work-in-progress, day 3
Dear colleagues,
Attached please find the report with current comment status, at the end of day 3 of the TF meeting. We have 3 comments left that need homework assignments to e completed, where we will pick up tomorrow (Curtis will send schedule details). Please, make sure your homework for this meeting is done and ready for discussion tomorrow.
Regards
Marek Hajduczenia
P802.3ca Task Force Chief Editor
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-NGEPON list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-NGEPON&A=1