Re: [802.3_50G] Updates to traverso_022217_3cd_adhoc

["Matt Traverso (mattrave)" <mattrave@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Mike,

Thanks! The table reference in the extra bullet for 140.7.5 is fixed to point to Table 140-6 rather than Table 140-11.  I believe pointing to a table is more appropriate than a “hard coded” value.  I had intended to use Table 140-6 with it’s return loss value of 15.5 dB, but had inadvertently typed the wrong reference.

 

Similarly, I neglected to delete the extra copy of Table 140-8. 

 

Both items are now addressed in the attached v3.

 

thanks

--matt

 

From: Dudek, Mike [mailto:Mike.Dudek@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 10:00 AM
To: Matt Traverso (mattrave); STDS-802-3-50G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Updates to traverso_022217_3cd_adhoc

 

 

Slide 13 I think is wrong.   You shouldn’t be pointing to Table 140-11 where the return loss is 27dB.    I think it should say “The optical return loss is 15.5dB.”

 

With this change you can add me as a supporter.

 

Also I don’t know why you are repeating Table 140-8 with slight differences on slides 9 and 10.   I’d suggest you delete the version on slide 9.

 

 

From: Matt Traverso (mattrave) [mailto:mattrave@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 9:38 AM
To: STDS-802-3-50G@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_50G] Updates to traverso_022217_3cd_adhoc

 

Colleagues,

Thank you for your time and inputs this morning to review traverso_022217_3cd_adhoc in the ad hoc call.  I have attached an updated revision.  I believe it captures the essence of all the feedback I received.  I will submit a comment against D1.2 per the summary bullet.  I believe that the editor, Peter Stassar, may begin soliciting improved wording for a smoother Task Force meeting in Vancouver.

 

thanks

--matt

Attachment: traverso_022217_3cd_adhoc-v3.pdf
Description: traverso_022217_3cd_adhoc-v3.pdf