Dear colleagues,
According
to the call discussion on Monday, we think it would be good
to bring the questions to the list and ask for more review
and comments.
1.
Ask
for review on Ethernet Link OAM module
Based
on feedbacks from July meeting, we have prepared a mapping
table between Ethernet Link OAM module and managed
objects/attributes from 802.3 Clause 30, together with some
texts which is mainly based on what we have in IEEE 802.3.1
spec.
Also,
the ELO module itself has some changes when doing the
review, which is stated in the update document.
The
revised documents based on feedback yesterday have been
uploaded at
http://www.ieee802.org/3/cf/public/adhoc/index.html,
please take a look and share your comments to improve it.
2.
Plan
on the NMDA work
As
you might know, IETF has started the NMDA work which affects
how we modeling YANG modules.
As
for now, the revised ietf-interface module(rfc7223bis) has
been submitted at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis/
, also the guideline for YANG modeling (rfc6087bis) is on
the way at
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-13 . We
plan to head to NMDA and would like to discuss how to move
this work forward. The detailed information can be found at
http://www.ieee802.org/3/cf/public/adhoc/NMDA%20discussion.pdf, in
which 3 options are discussed:
·
Change
to NMDA style during Task Force stage (D1.x)
·
Change
to NMDA style during WG ballot (D2.x)
·
Leave
the NMDA work to future maintenance.
Please feel free
to share your thoughts and comments on the topics above.
They will be discussed and hopefully approved in Charlotte.
Thank
you very much.
Best Regards,
Yan