| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Gitesh & Heath – Thank you for your contributions. For much of the ad hoc I was on listen-only, and missed a bit of the discussion on your two contributions. I had a minor comment on stewart_1018_01.pdf (cable resistance measurement) – generally I support the idea of having some margin on the cable resistance measurement. I’m wary of naming and describing it only as to account for temperature
variation of the cable resistance (although I agree that is the most obvious reason for margin). I’d prefer to see simply a resistance margin factor, (a renaming of the factor) so that if we find other reasons to add margin, people aren’t asking for additional
controls. On bhagwat_1018_01.pdf, I may have missed it, but are there any changes to the text being requested?
George A. Zimmerman, Ph.D. President & Principal Consultant CME Consulting, Inc. Experts in PHYsical Layer Communications 1-310-920-3860 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-10SPE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-10SPE&A=1 |